kidkong написал:
Сомневаюсь, что "Beyond Acceptance" это "За принятие". Хотя, пути Кинопоиска и его адептов неисповедимы.

kidkong написал:
А можно для тупых расшифровать: что ты имел в виду?

uhtyshk написал:

kidkong написал:
"Beyond Acceptance", насколько я нашёл в гугле, это религиозно-психоаналитический термин, название целой книги 1986-го года выпуска, ему посвящённой. В двух словах, когда человек узнаёт, например, что он неизлечимо болен или он, скажем, гей, то он проходит 5 стадий:1-отрицание, 2-злость, 3-торг (bargaining), 4-депрессия, 5-принятие (acceptance)"Beyond acceptance" - "за пределами принятия", "далее принятия" - изучает то, что происходит дальше.

Griffin-Wirths написал:
Sometimes this new acceptance of the gay child manifests itself in small ways, like phone calls that end with "Give our love to Ray". And sometimes it is seen in more dramatic ways as parents, family, and friends go beyond acceptance and involve themselves in the struggle of the gay person for safety and equity in society.

Griffin-Wirths написал:
Before exploring features of the road to a positive resolution, it is useful to identify some of the ways that parents react immediately after finding out. There are four actions that parents may take that are typical. The first three lead to parental despair; the fourth opens possibilities for change and, eventually, inner peace. They are: breacking contact, trying to change the child, ignoring the issue, and accepting reality.

Friedman-James написал:
The phrase, “we would get a feeling” is especially revealing since Kubler-Ross’ feelings were processed through the filter of her life-long unresolved grief and retained anger. We know that because she went public about the anguish of her past in her final book, On Grief and Grieving, co-authored with David Kessler and published shortly after her death in 2004. In the final chapter, titled My Own Grief, she tells the gruesome story about an episode involving her father and a cherished childhood pet that caused her to make an oath never to cry again. That event, along with a host of other personal grief incidents, resulted in her bottling up a lifetime of anger that she admitted she didn’t deal with until very late in life.
When you read about Kubler-Ross’ life, you sense how much her painful past may have colored her interpretation of her interviews with dying patients. Interestingly, anger is the only stage Kubler-Ross contends is absolute for everyone in dying, or in grieving relationships with those who have died. It seems as if the palpable anger she carried for years caused her to insist we all must have anger about loss. We’re not sure why Kubler-Ross felt compelled to convert her observations from the interviews into stages. Possibly she believed that what she heard in her interviews with dying people was actually stages that needed to be quantified, or perhaps she simply attempted to put a scientific face on anecdotal evidence.

Ответ от kidkong
Добавил в новость.